So Why Did It Take You So Long?
Note: Over the summer, I am re-printing a number of columns that are still timely. Here is one first published September 2013 in response to a campaign of disinformation coming out of Singapore.
Oh those poor people! One has to spare a moment of sympathy for the poor lads and lasses at the Singaporean police forces. It has been a rough last couple of months for them. In June, they had to endure the embarrassment of a Singapore police officer being arrested in Malaysia with the help of the local police for the murder of a father and son businessmen in Singapore. Then in July, an assistant director of their anti-corruption bureau was arrested for a multi-million-dollar alleged gambling-linked fraud. Now these sensitive souls have expressed themselves to be shocked and outraged that anyone in the international community could doubt their commitment to arresting well-known match-fixers in their jurisdiction.
Last week, in the light of the Dan Tan arrest, I did an interview with the BBC World Service. In the interview, I pointed out the obvious – that Dan Tan’s alleged match-fixing activities have been widely-known for years. The Italian, Hungarian, German and Finnish police have repeatedly asked Singapore for their help in apprehending fixers. The Singaporeans when confronted with an international arrest warrant for Dan Tan did not move in a speedy and timely fashion.
Yesterday, the Singaporean police issued a statement claiming to be deeply disappointed in my comments.
Okay. Let us compare the Singaporean police actions with almost any other police force involved in the match-fixing investigations of the last few years.
The Finnish police, in a small town north of the Arctic Circle, made a dozen arrests, completed an entire investigation on Dan Tan’s purported lieutenant and got a series of convictions in less than six months.
Helped by this case, the Italian police and prosecutors were able to produce close to four-hundred pages of evidence on Dan Tan’s alleged activities in their country in less than six months. This evidence has produced dozens of arrests and convictions in their country where they have labeled Dan Tan as ‘their number-one wanted man’.
The Italians then handed over much of their evidence to the Singaporean authorities.
Even with all this documentation and court room testimony the Singaporeans still could not bring themselves to arrest Mr. Tan for close to eleven-months.
Crikey! Even the Zimbabweans managed to work more quickly than the Singaporeans, when honest administrators and policemen investigated fixers infiltrating their Football Association.
Four months ago, the Hungarian police joined their Italian colleagues and also submitted an international arrest warrant for Dan Tan. Did that produce his immediate arrest?
Now the Singaporean police are also making the outrageous claim that they are the only jurisdiction that could arrest match-fixers properly.
“[Using lots of resources] … has enabled us to arrest the 14 suspects, including the suspected mastermind, using Singapore laws as no other jurisdictions could have done likewise using their laws.”
In making this bizarre claim, they ignore the hard and more timely work of the Finnish, Zimbabwean, Chinese, South Korean, Italian, German, Turkish, Greek, Maltese, Israeli, Czech, Slovak and Hungarian police forces – to name just a few more efficient police forces.
Let us be very clear, Singaporean police: do not try to shift the focus to people who are reporting the story. The world is saying to you, ‘One of your people is accused of coming to our countries and fixing our sports. Last year, you were presented with an international warrant for his arrest. You did not arrest him for over-eleven months. If he continued to fix our sports during that time than the fault is yours. If he did not fix any games since the international arrest warrant was issued – then what have you been doing?’
Given the Singaporeans slowness to move. The best thing that we can do now is get Dan Tan on a plane to a jurisdiction where the world can hear his full testimony. Then we can determine why he was such a lucky recipient of all this time.
Questions to Ask about the Detention of Dan Tan
- Why did it take so long?
- The original arrest warrants were delivered to Singapore almost one year ago. Nothing was done. Why not?
- Does this amount of warning to a suspect give them time to destroy potential evidence?
- Tan, has according to my sources, been detained under an anti-terrorism law. If so, does this mean that he will not have a chance to testify in an independent court? Thereby not giving the public a chance to hear all that he can tell? Thereby not giving him a fair trial?
- Ummm… why did it take so long? No, really, we still have not heard a credible reason why law authorities took almost one year to arrest a suspect.